*BSD News Article 80065


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!imci5!imci4!newsfeed.internetmci.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!nntp.crl.com!Symiserver2.symantec.com!news
From: tedm@agora.rdrop.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: bad vt102/vt220 termcap entry in FreeBSD 2.1?
Date: 6 Oct 1996 16:30:52 GMT
Organization: Symantec Corp.
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <538mrs$b9d@Symiserver2.symantec.com>
References: <rreiner.844306769@nexus.yorku.ca>
Reply-To: tedm@agora.rdrop.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: shiva1.central.com
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2.5

In <rreiner.844306769@nexus.yorku.ca>, rreiner@nexus.yorku.ca (Richard Reiner) writes:
>Several different terminal emulators, none of which have shown errors
>before, seem to have trouble with the vt102 termcap entry shipped w/

There is an excellent vt100 testing utility floating around called vttest or
some such that has a whole procedure for spitting out serieses of VT100 codes
to test various terminal emulators.

I've used it to test a lot of Windoze emulators and it is incredible how badly
they behave.  I've had the best luck with honest-to-god vt100 compatible
actual terminals.

You can also use this terminal program to figure out what series of command
codes your terminal emulator is misinterpreting and then go into the termcap
entry and strike out that feature.