Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:562 comp.unix.bsd:8067 Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!umeecs!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!wisner From: wisner@netcom.com (Bill Wisner) Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Message-ID: <1992Nov16.201631.6108@netcom.com> Organization: Trailing Edge Technologies, Mountain View, CA References: <1992Nov15.014513.28154@nobeltech.se> <1992Nov15.035135.15514@ra.msstate.edu> <Bxt8rG.DE3@fulcrum.co.uk> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 20:16:31 GMT Lines: 6 In article <Bxt8rG.DE3@fulcrum.co.uk> igb@fulcrum.co.uk (Ian G Batten) writes: >IBM don't. HP don't really. Wrong, and wrong again. w. <wisner@netcom.com> Gryphon Gang Mountain View CA 94043