Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!metro!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!nsw.news.telstra.net!nsw1.news.telstra.net!sa.news.telstra.net!vic.news.telstra.net!news.mira.net.au!pumpkin.pangea.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newstand.syr.edu!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!portc01.blue.aol.com!news-peer.gsl.net!news.gsl.net!uwm.edu!nntp.primenet.com!news1.best.com!nntp1.best.com!shellx!tporczyk From: tporczyk@best.com (Tony Porczyk) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: FBSD Future... Date: 11 Oct 1996 21:16:39 -0700 Organization: BEST Internet Communications Lines: 20 Message-ID: <tporczyk.845093633@shellx> References: <Dz37x9.7vC@news2.new-york.net> <53kr8l$pkt@newsbr.eunet.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: shellx.best.com X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #6 (NOV) fgm@osinet.fr (Frederic MARAND) writes: >Remember SCO now offers a free license of its Open Server for >personal, study, research. >I think this will probably diminish the needs of many FreeBSD/Linux >users to get these OSes: only people really wishing to tinker with >kernel code will stick to the really free OSes. Most people run them >to get unix apps running, not for the sake of debugging kernels. ? I want to use UNIX I run at work. *That's* why I use FreeBSD and Linux. SCO is an overpriced piece of crud I would not foist on anyone, friend or foe. Having it at home while I would never install it at work seems totally pointless to me. t. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Porczyk * tporczyk@infobound.com * San Jose, California GIT/ED d++$(!d) s++:++ a? C++++ USLB++++$ P+ E--- W(--) N++ !k w-- M- V? b- PS+++@ PE++ O X-- Y++@ PGP-- t+@ 5++ R* D---- e* V-- h* y** r+++(*)+++(*)>? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------