Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!newspump.sol.net!ddsw1!news.mcs.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.mathworks.com!EU.net!usenet2.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!dispatch.news.demon.net!demon!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!awfulhak.demon.co.uk!usenet
From: brian@anorak.coverform.lan (Brian Somers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FBSD Future...
Date: 13 Oct 1996 16:49:26 GMT
Organization: Coverform Ltd.
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <53r6im$a7@anorak.coverform.lan>
References: <Dz37x9.7vC@news2.new-york.net> <53kr8l$pkt@newsbr.eunet.fr>
<tporczyk.845093633@shellx>
Reply-To: brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: anorak.coverform.lan
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: awfulhak.demon.co.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8
In article <tporczyk.845093633@shellx>,
tporczyk@best.com (Tony Porczyk) writes:
> fgm@osinet.fr (Frederic MARAND) writes:
>
> ? I want to use UNIX I run at work. *That's* why I use FreeBSD and
> Linux. SCO is an overpriced piece of crud I would not foist on anyone,
> friend or foe. Having it at home while I would never install it at work
> seems totally pointless to me.
We use (some) SCO boxes at work, and I *still* use FreeBSD at home. I
would agree that even at the current $0.00 cost, SCO is a bit overpriced
for my liking.
--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
<http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk/>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....