Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!news.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.total.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.mathworks.com!uunet!news-in2.uu.net!nntp.inet.fi!news.funet.fi!news.cs.hut.fi!news.clinet.fi!not-for-mail From: mickey@cantina.clinet.fi (Mika Ruohotie) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: 100 BT ethernet card. Which one is better? Date: 9 Oct 1996 10:35:43 +0300 Organization: Clinet, Espoo, Finland Lines: 10 Message-ID: <53fkkf$oe5@cantina.clinet.fi> References: <53c9du$2tg@overload.lbl.gov> <53d0g4$a5r@newsbr.eunet.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: cantina.clinet.fi >jin@gracie.lbl.gov (Jin Guojun[ITG]) wrote: >>Within Intel EtherExpress Pro/100B, Novell NE2000, SMC EtherPower 10/100 >>(Model 9332), and 3C590, which one is easy to use and has less problems? smc etherpower 10/100 is nice... =) i believe atleast with freebsd you get better performance than from 3com... mickey