*BSD News Article 81361


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.wwa.com!osprey
From: osprey@wwa.com (Lucas D. Adamski)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: IDE Controller Problem
Date: 23 Oct 1996 02:51:39 GMT
Organization: WorldWide Access - Midwest Internet Services (http://www.wwa.com/)
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <54k17r$qot@kirin.wwa.com>
References: <5460pb$s9r@kirin.wwa.com> <54dfm0$3gs@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sashimi.wwa.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

J Wunsch (j@uriah.heep.sax.de), on 20 Oct 1996 15:15:12 GMT, gushed:

{ Does it come with an own BIOS?  If so, try disabling it.  There are
{ known incompatibilities with VL IDE controllers when the BIOS was
{ enabled.

{ Try replacing it by a `generic' IDE controller.  The VL-nes won't gain
{ you anything at all under FreeBSD.

I finally did get it working, even though I'm not sure quite how.  I kept 
fiddling with the various dip switches, etc till one day the boot disk 
just saw them.  But now I have a different problem (of course).  To recap, 
I'm running a Conner 30544 as the master with a DOS partition & the boot 
manager, and a Seagate 3391A as the BSD slave.  The problem is, that while 
the boot disk detects the slave just fine (and installation goes ok), it 
doesn't detect it when I boot off the hard drive.  The boot manager finds 
it, but when boot off the BSD partition on the slave, the kernel loads ok 
but then fails to detect the slave during the hardware detection phase 
(and so fails to mount the filesystems).  The oddest thing is, if I put it 
into -c configuration mode rather than hitting enter, go into the visual 
mode, save & quit, then the kernel DOES detect the slave and mounts 
everything just fine.  I'd think that it was a hardware conflict, except 
that this problem always occurs when I use the default (enter) boot, and 
it always works fine when I go through the -c (save & quit), even without 
actually changing any of the settings.  Anyone have any ideas what could 
be causing this?  Does the -c use the same kernel as the default?
	Thanks,
	  Lucas.


{ -- 
{ cheers, J"org

{ joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
{ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)


--
====----------------D-r-i-v-e--h-a-r-d--a-n-d--p-r-o-s-p-e-r----------------====
DePaul University Student  *  Low Acolyte in the Evil Order of UNIX Consultants
ST-DS '85 CRX Si, with brand new Yoko AVID's and a K&N drop in filter element.

      "I find your lack of faith disturbing."
                             - Darth Vader

     Fanatic - One who redoubles his efforts while losing sight of his goals.