Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!news.PBI.net!news.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.zipnet.net!usenet From: mi@video-collage.com (Mikhail Teterin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.admin Subject: Re: another ethernet to ppp routing problem (different subnets) Date: 24 Oct 1996 15:44:57 GMT Organization: ZipLink -- America's Hottest ISP Lines: 13 Sender: mi@xxx.video-collage.com Message-ID: <54o2tp$efn@news.zipnet.net> References: <54k7h5$jjk@news.zipnet.net> <326DD1AB.6E6A@nt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: xxx.video-collage.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CC: mabrams@video-collage.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:29909 comp.unix.admin:49140 In article <326DD1AB.6E6A@nt.com>, Graham Weeks <Graham_Weeks@nt.com> writes: > My guess here is that your ppp peer does not know that 222.222.222.0 > network is behind 199.232.254.68. That is the ppp peer does not know > how to route to 222.222.222.0. Probably not suprising is 222.222.222.0 > is an unregistered address (or registered to somebody else) and the > ppp peer is an ISP. Damn! This is indeed so obvious and simple, I am going to punish myself and work on NT for two days ;( -mi