Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:8206 comp.unix.solaris:603 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.solaris Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!think.com!unixland!rmkhome!rmk From: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Organization: The Man With Ten Cats Date: Thu, 26 Nov 1992 06:00:24 GMT Reply-To: rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) Message-ID: <9211260100.43@rmkhome.UUCP> References: <BxLz6x.EL7@cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov13.232053.7061@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <1992Nov16.075931@eklektix.com> <id.U_0V.SJ3@ferranti.com> <22947@venera.isi.edu> Lines: 37 In article <22947@venera.isi.edu> allard@isi.edu (Dennis Allard) writes: >peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) writes: >> ... Unfortunately, I suspect NT will do all this better and UNIX on >> the desktop is doomed whether it's SV or BSD. > >Unix has the following going for it. > >1. Millions of current users (NT has no users yet) >2. Has been ported to more platforms than DOS or Windows (will NT > seek to rival Unix in that regard. If so, how???) >3. Supports a network based windowing system. Will NT? (The Windows > API is not designed to work over a network, to my knowledge) >4. In particular, supports X windows. Will NT support X windows? >5. Freeware versions being worked on by quite compentant people. Will > NT have freeware versions? > >The typical criticisms I here about Unix are about things such as >cryptic commands and lack of a User Guide. I make those criticisms >myself. However, such things are easy to fix. Rarely does one hear >more substantive criticism about the OS architecture. There are >technical areas where Unix can be criticized, but I have no evidence >yet that NT will not have similar weak points. NT, after all, is OT. > >A prediction. UNIX will not die. If anything, the existence of NT >will educate more people about operating systems and cause an increase >in the number of systems capable of supporting Unix. This will be a >boon for Unix. Furthermore, internetworking between Unix and NT will >be a boon for Unix as people make use of the existing mature client/server >technologies which have been pioneered on Unix. And NT will mostly be marketed as a server for Intel boxes running Windows 3.x apps. It has no other method for being a truly multiuser OS. Which is probably why it will be marketed as Windows 3.1 NT. -- Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.UUCP unixland!rmkhome!rmk rmk@frog.UUCP