*BSD News Article 82061


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!cancer.vividnet.com!hunter.premier.net!news.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!Norway.EU.net!usenet
From: Kai Harrekilde-Petersen <khp@dolphinics.no>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux..misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Triton II/III Motherboards
Date: 30 Oct 1996 16:25:50 +0100
Organization: Dolphin Interconnect Solutions
Lines: 22
Sender: khp@scimitar.dolphinics.no
Message-ID: <kk3ybgo4gox.fsf@scimitar.dolphinics.no>
References: <32775018.555F@fpmbh.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: scimitar.dolphinics.no
In-reply-to: Larry Snyder's message of Wed, 30 Oct 1996 07:54:48 -0500
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.1
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:30407 comp.os.linux.hardware:55144 comp.os.linux.setup:80699

Larry Snyder <larry@fpmbh.com> writes:

> I'm curious as to what motherboard would be faster --
> 
> Triton II with onboard 512 pipeline cache 
> 
> or 
> 
> Triton III with a add-on 512 pipeline cache

Depends heavily on the memory configuration: The HX is capable of
caching more than 64Meg (up to 512Meg, to be precise), while the VX
can only cache 64Meg.

OTOH, the VX can use SDRAMs, which should be faster than EDO DRAM.


Kai
-- 
Kai Harrekilde-Petersen    <khp@dolphinics.no>    #include <std/disclaimer.h>
http://www.dolphinics.no/~khp/          Linux: the choice of a GNU generation
Route 287 - Where Men are Men and sheep are nervous ...