*BSD News Article 82088


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!metro!metro!asstdc.scgt.oz.au!nsw.news.telstra.net!act.news.telstra.net!psgrain!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!news.muc.de!news.space.net!news.camelot.de!news.hannibal.camelot.de!usenet
From: os@hannibal.camelot.de (Oliver Scheel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Problems with uucico
Date: 31 Oct 1996 18:00:59 GMT
Organization: Hannibal Online
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <55apgr$ls@hannibal.camelot.de>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.91.961023224820.1769C-100000@speedy.ruhr.de>
    <54pvdd$897@uriah.heep.sax.de> <54thaa$8ue@hannibal.camelot.de>
    <555rgi$621@uriah.heep.sax.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hannibal.camelot.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.7

In article <555rgi$621@uriah.heep.sax.de>,
	j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) writes:

> UMC8669F?

I own the Chaintech M586IFM which uses an UM(C?)8669F (c't says this). I
thought this only concerns older boards (I bought my Chaintech three or four
months ago).

> These chips are broken, period.  You can find software workarounds
> (and there is one in the current driver), but the origin of the
> problems is a broken (by design) chip.  They've botched the FDC, and
> they've botched the UARTs.  (The FDC generates unexpected interrupts,
> the UARTs don't resynchronize when changing the divisor latch while
> data are flowing in -- even if you change it to the same value.)

Very nice :-(. And why does this happen only with UUCP?

I will try UUCP with my third sio (original 16550) next week.

Many thanks.

Oliver

-- 
*** Oliver Scheel, Zenettistr. 45a, D-80337 Muenchen, Germany ***
*** email: os@hannibal.camelot.de  http://www.camelot.de/~os/ ***