Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.os.linux..misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!news.caldera.com!enews.sgi.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!netcom.com!stephenk From: stephenk@netcom.com (Stephen Knilans) Subject: Re: Triton II/III Motherboards Message-ID: <stephenkE0BJtL.3wp@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <32775018.555F@fpmbh.com> Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 23:56:09 GMT Lines: 20 Sender: stephenk@netcom21.netcom.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:30542 comp.os.linux.hardware:55372 comp.os.linux.setup:81010 In article <32775018.555F@fpmbh.com> Larry Snyder <larry@fpmbh.com> writes: >I'm curious as to what motherboard would be faster -- > >Triton II with onboard 512 pipeline cache > >or > >Triton III with a add-on 512 pipeline cache > > >OS would be Linux/BSD/NT 4.0 To the best of my knowledge, it doesn't matter whether the cache is added or not! There is NO such thing as the TRITON III, so I have NO idea what you are talking about. The 430HX is faster than the 430VX! Steve