Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:618 comp.unix.bsd:8284
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T)
Message-ID: <id.IOCV.AC2@ferranti.com>
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
References: <1et7fnINN6nr@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <id.A5AV.9ZA@ferranti.com> <1992Nov28.110233.175@degsyd.syd.deg.csiro.au>
Distribution: inet
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1992 05:10:01 GMT
Lines: 15
In article <1992Nov28.110233.175@degsyd.syd.deg.csiro.au> ip_boss@degsyd.syd.deg.csiro.au (Jack Churchill) writes:
> So what did you expect - to look like Solaris?
What did I say that gave you the faintest idea I cared about Solaris?
> Solaris is yet another Sun-proprietary UNIX, etc.
System V isn't Solaris. System V is about the only hope *I* can see for a
decent user-friendly UNIX that can compete with OS/2 and NT. And Univel is
doing its best to sink it.
--
%Peter da Silva/77487-5012 USA/+1 713 274 5180/Have you hugged your wolf today?
/D{def}def/I{72 mul}D/L{lineto}D/C{curveto}D/F{0 562 moveto 180 576 324 648 396
736 C 432 736 L 482 670 518 634 612 612 C}D/G{setgray}D .75 G F 612 792 L 0 792
L fill 1 G 324 720 24 0 360 arc fill 0 G 3 setlinewidth F stroke showpage % 100