Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.solaris:623 comp.unix.bsd:8309 Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!ornl!rsg1.er.usgs.gov!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!loverso From: loverso@coltsfoot.osf.org (John Robert LoVerso) Subject: Re: Solaris 1.1 vs. Solaris 2.0 (BSD vs AT&T) Message-ID: <1992Nov19.164146.26801@osf.org> Sender: news@osf.org (USENET News System) Organization: OSF Research Institute, Cambridge MA References: <kzin.721442926@cc.gatech.edu> <BxLz6x.EL7@cs.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov13.232053.7061@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <VIXIE.92Nov14194825@cognition.pa.dec.com> <327@wafbox.UUCP> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 16:41:46 GMT Lines: 16 In article <327@wafbox.UUCP>, bill@wafbox.UUCP (Bill Fulton) writes: |> Emminent death of SysV Unix predicted! :-) |> |> (Who's gonna tell Robert, Brian, and the rest of the guys working Version |> nine that they don't know UNIX from "a hole in thier ass"?) AT&T != UNIX. BSD != UNIX. SYSV != UNIX. (OSF/1 != UNIX) UNIX == Tenth Edition. And it is over. See Plan 9. ``Not only is UNIX dead, it's starting to smell really bad.'' -- Rob Pike John