Return to BSD News archive
Message-ID: <329E9386.8CB@3-cities.com> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 23:40:54 -0800 From: Mark Smith <msmith@3-cities.com> Reply-To: msmith@3-cities.com Organization: Lost Somewhere in Time X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Iomega Tape 250 timeouts on ASUS on-board fdc0 References: <329abf4c.222061@news.eunet.ch> <57g2ft$jmu@uriah.heep.sax.de> <329BF78F.24E7@3-cities.com> <57l375$hr0@uriah.heep.sax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: bigtca602.3-cities.com Lines: 14 Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!news.vbc.net!vbcnet-west!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!news.pbi.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!192.220.251.22!netnews.nwnet.net!galaxy.3-cities.com! J Wunsch wrote: > > Mark Smith <msmith@3-cities.com> wrote: > > > > Can you try a different (external) floppy controller? The UMC8669F on > > > the P55T2P4 is known to be not bug-compatible with the NE765. While > > Dunno. Have a look there what chip they're using now. That would be their "super mulit i/o" chip? let me take a look. The chip is a Winbond chip. I didn't get the exact number off of it but it's NOT the UMC chip. It's the UMC chip that's flaky, right? Thanks Mark