*BSD News Article 83886


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!inferno.mpx.com.au!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!howland.erols.net!feed1.news.erols.com!news
From: Ken Bigelow <kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Installing Windows NT 4.0 on a disk with FreeBSD
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 09:11:29 +0000
Organization: Erol's Internet Services
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <329EA8C1.20A5@www.play-hookey.com>
References: <57lg1e$o8n@shell.fore.com>
Reply-To: kbigelow@www.play-hookey.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: kenjb05.play-hookey.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; U)

Rajesh Vaidheeswarran wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I have a question regarding WinNT and FreeBSD.
> 
> I have a disk with FreeBSD 2.1.5 and Win 95. Things are Ok now. I am planning
> to replace Win 95 with NT 4.0.
> 
> Am I at risk of losing my FreeBSD partition now? I know that Win 95 is
> quite brain dead, and WILL destroy.. but is Win NT the same way?
> 
> Has anyone done a successful install of Win NT on a disk that
> already had FreeBSD?
> 

One caveat to watch out for: Every effort we have made (where I work) to
install NT Server 4.0 with NTFS as opposed to a FAT implementation has
resulted in NT taking over the entire hard drive, regardless of how it
was previously partitioned. This loses all prior information on the
drive.

To avoid losing existing data, I think you'll have to stick with the FAT
system.
-- 
Ken

Are you interested in   |
byte-sized education    |   http://www.play-hookey.com
over the Internet?      |