Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!pacbell.com!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!JUTS!griffin!gab10 From: gab10@griffincd.amdahl.com (Gary A Browning) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: [386BSD] Enhanced pccons w/source Message-ID: <08hl02ts2dSD01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> Date: 1 Dec 92 05:13:46 GMT References: <4134@wzv.win.tue.nl> <VIXIE.92Nov29123446@cognition.pa.dec.com> <JKH.92Nov29233821@whisker.lotus.ie> <1fdh37INN63n@hrd769.brooks.af.mil> Sender: netnews@ccc.amdahl.com Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 29 In article <1fdh37INN63n@hrd769.brooks.af.mil>, burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil (Dave Burgess) writes: [ .. deleted .. ] > My question then is whether > or not something as functional as shared libraries (which doesn't > impact the > kernel) be controlled? [ .. deleted .. ] > Have any of the folks that are working > on shared libraries actually LOOKED at the shared library code? What > can be > learned from the shared library code that may be of use to the NEW > shared > library code? [ .. deleted .. ] > I would be surprised to find anyone offer any enhancements > to the shared library code now that so many people have spit on it. Did I miss something about shared library support in 386bsd 0.1? I didn't think we had shared libraries in either the original release or as a later addition. Is there an alpha/beta product I do not know about? Is there disabled source code in 0.1? Please elaborate Dave. -- Gary Browning | Exhilaration is that feeling you get just after a | great idea hits you, and just before you realize | what is wrong with it.