Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!pacbell.com!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!JUTS!griffin!gab10
From: gab10@griffincd.amdahl.com (Gary A Browning)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: [386BSD] Enhanced pccons w/source
Message-ID: <08hl02ts2dSD01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
Date: 1 Dec 92 05:13:46 GMT
References: <4134@wzv.win.tue.nl> <VIXIE.92Nov29123446@cognition.pa.dec.com> <JKH.92Nov29233821@whisker.lotus.ie> <1fdh37INN63n@hrd769.brooks.af.mil>
Sender: netnews@ccc.amdahl.com
Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
Lines: 29
In article <1fdh37INN63n@hrd769.brooks.af.mil>,
burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil (Dave Burgess) writes:
[ .. deleted .. ]
> My question then is whether
> or not something as functional as shared libraries (which doesn't
> impact the
> kernel) be controlled?
[ .. deleted .. ]
> Have any of the folks that are working
> on shared libraries actually LOOKED at the shared library code? What
> can be
> learned from the shared library code that may be of use to the NEW
> shared
> library code?
[ .. deleted .. ]
> I would be surprised to find anyone offer any enhancements
> to the shared library code now that so many people have spit on it.
Did I miss something about shared library support in 386bsd 0.1? I didn't
think we had shared libraries in either the original release or as a later
addition. Is there an alpha/beta product I do not know about? Is there
disabled source code in 0.1?
Please elaborate Dave.
--
Gary Browning | Exhilaration is that feeling you get just after a
| great idea hits you, and just before you realize
| what is wrong with it.