Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!EU.net!Ireland.EU.net!Ireland.EU.net!not-for-mail From: nick@eunet.ie (Nick Hilliard) Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.smail,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Sendmail vs. Smail... Followup-To: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.smail,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Date: 6 Dec 1996 17:07:34 -0000 Organization: EUnet Ireland Network Operations Lines: 8 Message-ID: <589jsm$o2v@ezekiel.eunet.ie> References: <57tf61$gq7@raven.eva.net> <584aao$5im@rzstud1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <vusp5k6iy2.fsf@moocow.math.nat.tu-bs.de> <589e5u$35t@stdismas.bogon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.ieunet.ie X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.mail.sendmail:34842 comp.mail.smail:2642 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:32139 John Henders (jhenders@bogon.com) said: : Then why don't you look at exim. It really has the best of both worlds. : Human readably config files, and much more flexibility than smail. How ... but retains smail's poor queueing strategy and lack of header rewriting capabilities :-( Nick, in search of the perfect mail relay system