*BSD News Article 84423


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!cancer.vividnet.com!hunter.premier.net!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!raven.eva.net!bighorn.accessnv.com!jca
From: jca@bighorn.accessnv.com (J.C. Archambeau)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.smail,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Sendmail vs. Smail...
Date: 6 Dec 1996 19:27:14 GMT
Organization: Access Nevada Inc.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <589s2i$aro@raven.eva.net>
References: <57tf61$gq7@raven.eva.net>  <584aao$5im@rzstud1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <vusp5k6iy2.fsf@moocow.math.nat.tu-bs.de> <589e5u$35t@stdismas.bogon.com> <589jsm$o2v@ezekiel.eunet.ie>
NNTP-Posting-Host: bighorn.accessnv.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.mail.sendmail:34877 comp.mail.smail:2648 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:32177

Nick Hilliard (nick@eunet.ie) wrote:
:: Then why don't you look at exim. It really has the best of both worlds.
:: Human readably config files, and much more flexibility than smail. How

: ... but retains smail's poor queueing strategy and lack of header rewriting
: capabilities :-(

: Nick, in search of the perfect mail relay system

What have been your findings so far?  I have received an e-mail 
recommendation for qmail which is fast, but I don't how about its
security and filtering features.  I am willing to hand off the filtering
to procmail and elm.
--
/*
** Internet: jca@accessnv.com | Don't blame me, I didn't vote for Clinton.
**           jca@anv.net      | Intel is the word for 'errata.'
***************************************************************************
** Note: Please direct all unsolicited commercial e-mail (Spam) to the
**       special account postmaster@accessnv.com.  Thank you.
***************************************************************************
*/