*BSD News Article 8448


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.ultrix:15326 comp.sys.dec:10529 comp.unix.bsd:8504
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix,comp.sys.dec,comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.hawaii.edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!torn!sis!richard
From: richard@sis.uucp (Richard Baird)
Subject: Re: Disktab for Emulex sd893 and 4.3 install to non DEC disk
Message-ID: <1992Dec1.200759.25177@sis.uucp>
Followup-To: comp.unix.ultrix
Summary: More details of Emulex sd893
Sender: Richard Baird <richard.baird@sheridanc.on.ca>
Organization: Sheridan College, Ontario, Canada
References: <1992Nov27.185227.12421@sis.uucp>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1992 20:07:59 GMT
Lines: 38

In article <1992Nov27.185227.12421@sis.uucp> I wrote:

>I have two questions:
>
>1. Does anyone have a disktab entry for these disks. Emulex calls them 
>   SD893. On the serial # plate is the line "Seagate st82272j" and on 
>   the flaw sheet it says "Certifier Id      SABR2270", and to top it off
>   VMS saw these disks as ra81.  I checked out the /pub/DEC/ultrix-disktabs 
>   file on gatekeeper, but didn't see anything relevent. 

After some more digging I have found that this disk is what seagate refers
to as a D-stroke SABER6. From my discussion with a seagate tech support 
person, I think this is a SABER6 with the transfer speed slowed down to
accomodate DEC controllers.

What kind of (magic ?) formula is used to calculate disktab entries, or is
it simply trial & error?? If there is a formula (or procedure), I am willing 
to try and develop one myself :(

(I assume partitions and number of cylinders/cylinder group are laid out to 
minimize disk head movement )


The disk geometry supplied by emulex is 

19 heads
77 sectors/track
2607 cylinders

Any help would be appreciated,

Richard
--
Richard Baird               |e-mail:  richard.baird@sheridanc.on.ca           
Computing & Communications  |phone: (416) 845-9430 x2135  #include <disclaim.h>
Sheridan College, Oakville, |   Sorry, I'm not in the mood for witty
Ont. Canada                 |     comments today - maybe next week ;)