*BSD News Article 84884


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!howland.erols.net!swrinde!news.uh.edu!bonkers!web.nmti.com!peter
From: peter@nmti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.osf.osf1
Subject: Re: Solaris 2.6
Date: 12 Dec 1996 22:44:13 GMT
Organization: Network/development platform support, NMTI
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <58q1rt$mgf@web.nmti.com>
References: <32986299.AC7@mail.esrin.esa.it> <32B04040.68FD@nho.hydro.com> <58pjda$atb@web.nmti.com> <32B05FCD.7C5@nho.hydro.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sonic.nmti.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.solaris:92364 comp.unix.bsd.misc:1800 comp.unix.internals:11599 comp.unix.osf.osf1:17030

In article <32B05FCD.7C5@nho.hydro.com>,
Birger Wathne  <Birger.Wathne@nho.hydro.com> wrote:
> > Well, I had some packages that were set up for BSD or System V, and found
> > that they were easier to get running if I told them it was a BSD box.
> True for packages that mean 'System V release < 4'.

I dunno, man. I didn't have the same sort of problems with UnixWare and
UHC SVR4.
-- 
</peter>