*BSD News Article 85265


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 1513 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!enews.sgi.com!news.sgi.com!howland.erols.net!worldnet.att.net!uunet!in2.uu.net!128.248.178.247!koobera.math.uic.edu!djb
From: djb@koobera.math.uic.edu (D. J. Bernstein)
Message-ID: <1996Dec2000.07.45.5990@koobera.math.uic.edu>
Date: 20 Dec 1996 00:07:45 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.smail,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Sendmail vs. Smail...
References: <57tf61$gq7@raven.eva.net> <598tvm$t0h@ezekiel.eunet.ie> <1996Dec1821.08.45.5092@koobera.math.uic.edu> <59bjh9$fl1@ezekiel.eunet.ie>
Organization: IR
Lines: 19
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.mail.sendmail:35400 comp.mail.smail:2746 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:32822

In article <59bjh9$fl1@ezekiel.eunet.ie>, Nick Hilliard <nick@eunet.ie> wrote:
> (from a traffic/ bandwidth/other system utilisation POV)

Blatant hypocrisy. See http://pobox.com/~djb/txt/modest-proposal.txt.

> The delivery delay in sending messages with multiple envelope address is
> generally not large - it might cause a short delay, but nothing that anyone
> could complain about.

False. I've already mentioned the case of a message that sendmail simply
_could not deliver_ because it insisted on using multiple RCPTs.

> considerably more IP traffic

False. Measurements have shown at three separate sites that switching
from sendmail to qmail _reduces_ traffic.

---Dan
Put an end to unauthorized mail relaying. http://pobox.com/~djb/qmail.html