*BSD News Article 86427


Return to BSD News archive

#! rnews 1365 bsd
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lucy.swin.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!not-for-mail
From: Marcelo Cantos <marcelo@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: kernel
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 11:29:39 +1100
Organization: MDS Group, RMIT
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <32D2EA73.25C7@mds.rmit.edu.au>
References: <59ac1t$hq1@news6.noc.netcom.net> <59kckh$ctb@portal.gmu.edu> <N.122396.190522.99@scrantr> <32D22D1B.616B@elektron.et.tudelft.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sinope.mds.rmit.edu.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; SunOS 5.3 sun4m)
To: "J. Frenk alias Sigmund Freud" <eensteen@elektron.et.tudelft.nl>
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.development.system:38253 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:33786

J. Frenk alias Sigmund Freud wrote:
> 
> Richard Scranton wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> I have a kernel 2.0.18, and I wanna put a new one on it. I saw that
> there is 2.027, and there are several 2.1.x versions.
> Which one is the most stable to use?

Even numbered second-level versions are stable, ie: 2.0.x. Odd-numbers
are development versions, ie: 2.1.x, steer clear of them if you want
stability. I presume 2.2.x will follow when 2.1.x reaches stability.

> Thnx

Your welcome!


--mdc