Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!news.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!newspump.sol.net!newsfeeds.sol.net!uwm.edu!newsspool.doit.wisc.edu!news.doit.wisc.edu!news From: Gabor Kincses <gabor@acm.org> Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: freebsd and win95osr2 (fat32) Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 23:24:21 -0600 Organization: University of Wisconsin, Madison Lines: 18 Message-ID: <32E05E85.167EB0E7@acm.org> References: <01bc0308$c1901c00$321d47c0@ho.leissner.se> <32E04002.259E@hotmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: f181-186.net.wisc.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE i386) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:33970 charles hanna wrote: > > > the coexistance of win95osr2 and freebsd? > > I've succeded in getting FreeBSD 2.1.5 running with win95 on the same > hard drive, but I have each on it's own partition. I use the boot > managaer that came with the Walnut Creek CDROM. > > Glenn. Is that OS-BS (135 or Beta) or BootEasy? Both are on the 2.1.5 CDROM. My employer wants me to install W95 sooner or later. So I'm bracing myself. :( -- Gabor Kincses (gabor@acm.org)