Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!atha!aupair.cs.athabascau.ca!rwa From: rwa@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca (Ross Alexander) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: [386bsd] router configuration ? Message-ID: <rwa.724012187@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca> Date: 10 Dec 92 18:29:47 GMT References: <ZZO910W@desert.in-berlin.de> <1992Dec10.173400.29309@sernews.raleigh.ibm.com> Sender: news@cs.athabascau.ca Lines: 24 >In article <ZZO910W@desert.in-berlin.de> Steffen Hellwig writes: >> please imagine the following situation: >> I have three unix machines, say A, B, C (last both run 386bsd). >> A and B are connected via slip, B and C via Ethernet (ne2000). >> Networking (ping, telnet, ftp etc.) works from A<->B and from B<->C >> (both ways). >> But i can't ping C from A or A from C. >> Of corse i set the routes on A and C like >> A: route add C B >> C: route add A B Did you have "options GATEWAY" set when you built B's kernel? regards, Ross -- Ross Alexander rwa@cs.athabascau.ca (403) 675 6311 ve6pdq@nebulus.ampr.ab.ca "One way of writing a book by a committee is to restrict its contents to the intersection of the various opinions; it is a technique that tends to lead to short texts of high quality, and has the advantage that in the case of a sufficiently diverse committee, it leads to no text at all." E. W. Dijkstra