Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!newsfeeds.sol.net!hammer.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!nwnet.net!not-for-mail From: aad@nwnet.net (Anthony Talltree) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI (was Re: Linux vs BSD) Date: 27 Jan 1997 12:46:11 -0800 Organization: NorthWestNet, Bellevue, WA, USA, Earth Lines: 7 Message-ID: <5cj46j$11m@lovecraft.nwnet.net> References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <5c97cd$f6h@cynic.portal.ca> <5cblts$emh@junkie.gnofn.org> <tvzpxvpk36.fsf@betze.bbn.hp.com> Reply-To: aad@nwnet.net NNTP-Posting-Host: lovecraft.nwnet.net Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:154489 comp.os.linux.setup:94099 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5750 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2047 >> It's things like tagged queueing and the ability to saturate your bus >> with multiple devices that make SCSI a win on real OSes. Modulo the need to disable tagged queueing since vendors have tended to not implement it well.