*BSD News Article 88145


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!uunet!in2.uu.net!199.94.215.18!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!news.iquest.net!not-for-mail
From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@freebsd.org>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 1997 21:01:59 -0500
Organization: John S. Dyson's home machine
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <32F54717.41C67EA6@freebsd.org>
References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <32EA25AB.41C67EA6@freebsd.org> <m2zpxxtagf.fsf@desk.crynwr.com> <32EE6844.167EB0E7@FreeBSD.org> <E504AI.Jsu@bigbird.telly.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dyson.iquest.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:155831 comp.os.linux.networking:67061 comp.os.linux.setup:95200 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2207

Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> 
> > It's going a little stale!
> 
> Sez you. Prove that it's stale. Explain how Russell wasn't right a year
> ago. Dredge up your original answer from the archives if it'll help.
> Demonstrate that you can deal with opposition without resorting to
> whining about when you first encountered the dissent.
> 
Actually, it is BSD freedom lovers who have the dissenting opinion,
against the big, bad GPL self replicating machine :-).  (BTW, I would
have loved to work on Linux, but the license terms are yucky, and
don't help one of my goals -- enabling lots of little start-ups
with good quality OS code, with a non-GPL encumbered runtime.)

John