Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!yama.mcc.ac.uk!cs.man.ac.uk!fellowsd From: fellowsd@cs.man.ac.uk (Donal K. Fellows) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: GPL Date: 3 Feb 1997 14:09:04 GMT Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of Manchester, U.K. Lines: 18 Message-ID: <5d4ri0$e93@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <32ED1866.34F02393@indiana.edu> <32F167BB.41C67EA6@freebsd.org> <0rnuc5.3e1.ln@zen> NNTP-Posting-Host: r8h.cs.man.ac.uk NNTP-Posting-User: 8028 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.advocacy:82149 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2205 [ Newsgroups: trimmed hard ] In article <0rnuc5.3e1.ln@zen>, Robert Brockway <s316674@student.uq.edu.au> wrote: [ GPL vs. BSD licensing ] > Both licenses seem to have a place in the world, as far as i am concerned. > Why does this discussion flare up every few months? Because we need to have something to argue about when we've run out of other things? This whole debate feels a bit like an idle task to me... :^) Donal. -- Donal K. Fellows http://r8h.cs.man.ac.uk:8000/ (SAY NO TO COMMERCIAL SPAMS!) (work) fellowsd@cs.man.ac.uk Dept. Comp. Sci, Univ. Manchester, U.K. | donal@ugglan.demon.co.uk 6,Randall Place, Heaton, Bradford, U.K. (home) +-> ++44-161-275-6137 Send correspondence to my office ++44-1274-401017 <-+