Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au!news.apana.org.au!cantor.edge.net.au!news.mira.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!news.mel.connect.com.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!cloudbreak.rs.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!ha2.ntr.net!uunet!in1.uu.net!199.170.2.253!beacon.moontower.com!news.fc.net!usenet From: Linas Vepstas <linas@fc.net> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: Betting on Unix Date: Fri, 07 Feb 1997 03:35:39 -0600 Organization: Intransco Lines: 31 Message-ID: <32FAF76B.577321E@fc.net> References: <5d3sr2$44n@nntp1.best.com> <nLVF2tL@quack.kfu.com> <5daq9b$tck@usenet1y.prodigy.net> <32F90AEB.41C6@osf.org> <5dctol$13si@usenet1y.prodigy.net> <E5715J.44@midway.uchicago.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: shadygrove.teleportal.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.8 i486) To: Alex Yung <alyung@pookie.uchicago.edu> Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.setup:95956 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2358 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:52123 comp.os.os2.advocacy:266274 Alex Yung wrote: > Most of the Unix apps > are not built for any home users. It is meant for mission critical > processes. Each OS addresses certain need for certain population. There is no technical reason why unix couldn't have been the OS of choice for secretaries and home users. The practical reason why its not is that only one unix vendor, NeXT, ever really tried to make Unix easy to use. Turns out, they used the wrong marketing formula. The rest of the unix vendors didn't try anything similar (i.e. COSE) until 93-94, and by then Windows 3.1 was far too strongly entrenched in homes and offices. It was too late for the home and small office market. If Steven Jobs had taken the circa 1988-89-90 NeXT os and ported it to PC's, and thrown in a DOS emulator, neither Win95 or NT would exist today, Microsoft would be a small company selling Mac software, and unix would be the platform of choice for home and small office use. We would probably be complaining about big, bad Jobs, and cheering little itty-bitty Gates. No, the problem with unix is that the big unix vendors were too busy pursuing the high-margin, high-profit, low-volume workstation and mission-critical market to realize that the revolution brewing in low-cost, high-volume PC space would one day creep up on them and eat thier lunch. Its just history ... a twist of fate ... and a failure of vision (in the face of Bill Gates competing vision.) --linas P.S. our company deploys Linux for all of its mission-critical apps. The boss runs windows, and the sec'y has a mac.