*BSD News Article 88706


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!op.net!www.nntp.primenet.com!nntp.primenet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in3.uu.net!204.174.222.160!news.axionet.com!not-for-mail
From: Ryan <ryan@netidea.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject: Re: Betting on Unix
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 17:28:54 -0800
Organization: Axion internet
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <32FA8556.4FCB2B92@netidea.com>
References: <5d3sr2$44n@nntp1.best.com> <E50rGo.K3n@nonexistent.com> <nLVF2tL@quack.kfu.com> <5d85f5$9k2@qnx.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mpa77.axionet.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.25 i586)
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:157016 comp.os.linux.networking:67721 comp.os.linux.setup:96152 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5942 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2395 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:52252 comp.os.os2.advocacy:266534

Doug Santry wrote:
> Here I think you are dead wrong.  Unix doesn't want to be on your
> secretary's desk, nor in every den in the world.  It is for serious
> programming projects/research.   It doesn't want, not is it well
> suited for, day to day office typing.

unix yes, however I don't see that os/2 is a good server platform.
(neither is nt :)) I was having a problem with some of ibm's sites. I'm
assuming they are running warp server, so if they aren't... well I guess
I'm wrong. Anyway, the system was very very slow. I would wait 30+
seconds to start recieving a reply. Ouch. And this is *not* a network
related problem. Believe me, I know what I am doing...

As for unix on desktops... well unix is the most stable, most efficient
operating system. But the U/I is... ok, but the config is confusing for
non-experts (however for experts you can setup an entire system in 3
hours or less, ask... me :), so the answer is.... NeXT: nice U/I, cool
object oriented system, but with a unix microkernel (read:
stable/efficent). anyhow...


> W95 and Unix were conceived for different applications from the get go
> and both are happy where they are.  They aren't meant to compete with
> each other.

w95 wasn't conceived.. it grew from hacks and patches... unix was
*designed*. w95 represents 5 years of devolpment by a large software
company. unix represents _30_ years of development by experts, and the
best minds in computer science. Hmm...

> 
> >But Unix' achiles heel is that its compatability is only at source
> >level. Each CPU requires its own compiler, and each OS requires its
> 
> As with NT et al.

this is a achiles heel? how odd... I think that you can port a linux ELF
directly to a freebsd ELF system at the binary level (elf is cool :))

> 
> >own libraries. This, truly, is POSIX's next task - Application
> >independence at the shared library level. If I have an x86 ELF
> >binary, it should not matter what OS it was compiled on, I should
> 
> No way.

I agree with this statement: 'no way'. That task is not neccary. That
task has been supersceded by java: machine code portability. Now we need
more stable java interpreters.

> 
> >be able to run it without modification or without fetching the
> >libraries from somewhere. Unix is heading in this direction,
> >but the quicker it gets there, the quicker it will be seen as an
> >equal platform. And the quicker the applications will be ported
> >to it.
> 
> I don't know what you are saying here.  Equal platform?  To what?

No kidding, equal to what? nt? nt is a joke... a bad joke at that. it
makes me cry.


--
Ryan Rawson
System Administrator
The Net Idea Telecommunications Inc.
email: ryan@netidea.com