Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!howland.erols.net!news.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!news
From: Walter Hafner <hafner@suncog13.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: FreeBSD slower than Linux ?
Date: 06 Feb 1997 13:12:07 +0100
Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen, Germany
Lines: 24
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <s9nu3nqyvzc.fsf@suncog13.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de>
References: <dkleinh.854654600@isotope.ps.uci.edu>
<5crh6q$44j@synge.maths.tcd.ie> <5d830v$4bf@secmon.sarnoff.com>
<5d85t9$ipd@helena.MT.net> <5dapv0$d09@cleon.cc.gatech.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: suncog13.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35235
viren@cc.gatech.edu (Viren R. Shah) writes:
> I don't think it's all that obvious that the libraries need to be recompiled
> if you have a FPU, and I wonder how many FreeBSD users know about it, and
> how many actually do it.
I didn't know.
I recompiled.
I got 20% more speed.
(P-Pro 200; Testing the benchmark of our image processing
system. Actually according to our benchmark, the image processing speed
on a P-Pro under FreeBSD is now better than on a Ultra-143 or a Indigo2)
-Walter
--
Walter Hafner_____________________________ hafner@forwiss.tu-muenchen.de
<A href=http://www.forwiss.tu-muenchen.de/~hafner/>*CLICK*</A>
Wenn das so weiter geht, gibt es hier in DE bald mehr Internetprovider
als Kunden :)
Martin Imlau <treogem@berlin.snafu.de> in 283.6941T990T1916@berlin.snafu.de