Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: 10 Feb 1997 02:02:32 -0500 Organization: Panix Lines: 19 Message-ID: <5dmh68$ckm@panix2.panix.com> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <DERAADT.97Feb2203747@zeus.theos.com> <1f9b795947@emw4maba.slip.gp.fht-esslingen.de> <DERAADT.97Feb8183929@zeus.theos.com> Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5331 In article <DERAADT.97Feb8183929@zeus.theos.com>, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com> wrote: > >OpenBSD doesn't `want' to be "NetBSD plus more". Historically, that >was just how it was started... remember I was a NetBSD core developer >and hence this spin-off was a natural. But that statement isn't >intended to indicate this situation came out of a _desire_ to be >"NetBSD plus more". You were quite positively *not* a NetBSD core developer when, or immediately before, or IIRC even in the same year that, you "spun off" OpenBSD. I realize that you probably weren't trying to give that impression, but just so's nobody mistakenly acquires it... -- Thor Lancelot Simon tls@panix.COM Stumbling drunk in the railyard looking for God: http://www.panix.com/~tls/