Return to BSD News archive
#! rnews 4039 bsd Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!not-for-mail From: jw@qits.net.au.nospam (John Wiltshire) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy Subject: Re: A suggestion to Linux/Bsd Developers Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 09:56:28 GMT Organization: Traffic Systems Development Lines: 78 Message-ID: <33004211.263630009@news.uq.edu.au> References: <5d3sr2$44n@nntp1.best.com> <5dh0o6$ji9$1@nntp2.ba.best.com> <32fc51c1.5502622@news.uq.edu.au> <32FC730E.5361A401@triumf.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.15.56.5 X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.1/32.230 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:157600 comp.os.linux.networking:68020 comp.os.linux.setup:96633 comp.unix.bsd.bsdi.misc:5966 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2447 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:52520 comp.os.os2.advocacy:267050 Roberto Pavan <rpavan@triumf.ca> wrote: >John Wiltshire wrote: >> >> vss@shell2.ba.best.com (V.S. Senthilkumar) wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >From the previous thread in this newsgroup it is getting clear that, >> >unix is lacking a "cheap real word processor". (like MS Word) >> > >> > >> >I know that you guys are busy enhancing kernel and driver code. >> > >> > >> >But i think that, the time spent writing a Motif free word >> >processor is time really worth spent. >> > >> >(please don't give emacs+groff as a solution) >> > >> > >> >Put an end to this bullshit called NT. >> >> If you think word processing is all that is keeping NT going then you >> are a seriously deluded person. After all, word processing on NT has >> only become viable in the last 6 to 12 months (since Word95). >> >> Maybe you should look at the product before inventing ways to destroy >> it? > > >I don't think what the guy wrote is all that off base. The line is >blurring between Win95 and NT, and is only going to get more fuzzy in >the future. Since the vast majority of users out there will be using >Win95, one should look at what is the largest single app run on these >machines. Not true. Use NT and 95 for a while and you'll understand the similarity is only in the UI. >Word processors outpace all other apps in use on home/small office >computers by a country mile. I'll bet it's two or three to one. I'll >also >bet that Web software and spreadsheets are the next most common. These >programs are usually packaged with the sale of the comuter, so the user >usually gets a huge break on the cost of the apps. I've got Win95 on my >Pentium box for two reasons - so I can run WordPerfect and Quattro Pro - >two excellent programs. Since I'm a grad student, I got the Corel >Academic suite. I paid about $40 CDN for it the whole shebang. A lot >of stuff is on there that I'll never use, but I got a top-notch word >processor and spreadsheet for 1/10 the price of Word Perfect for Linux - >and no need to get Motif either. If I paid full price for the suite, it >still wouldn't equal the cost of the word processor for Linux and the >necessary libraries. > >Don't get me wrong - I love Linux, and use it most of the time, but when >I need a quick letter or calc sheet (I even do some heat transfer >computing on Quattro), I use Win95 - not because it's 'easier', but >because it has the right apps. > >If Unix (and if it's Unix, let's face it - it'll be Linux) is going to >become a serious competitor to Windows, the quality and price of the >available basic apps is going to have to come down. > >Just my 0.02 (CDN) This all applies to 95. Not NT because your first assertion was a bit general. John Wiltshire ----------------------------------------------------------- John Wiltshire | Email jw@qits.net.au Network Systems Engineer | Ph. W +61 7 38342783 Traffic Systems Development | H +61 7 33698557 ----------------------------------------------------------- These opinions may not be mine and are almost certainly not those of my employer!