Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mathworks.com!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.utell.co.uk!ui-gate.utell.co.uk!brian
From: brian@ui-gate.utell.co.uk (Brian Somers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Which 100Mbs ethernet card
Date: 14 Feb 1997 10:43:51 GMT
Organization: Utell International
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <5e1fl7$djj@ui-gate.utell.co.uk>
References: <5dr7s5$f5f@masters0.InterNex.Net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ui-gate.utell.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35379
Aaron Kushner (akushner@deimos.nc.com) wrote:
: After looking through the kernel config file LINT, I noticed that
: the word "buggy" was appended to the line with the 3c59x 3com card. Does
: the intel etherexpress perform more reliably than the 3com cards for
: freebsd 2.1.5?
IMO, yes, but I think the EtherPower 100 is the best (less CPU usage than
the intel etherexpress).
--
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> <brian@utell.co.uk> <brian@freebsd.org>
<http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !