*BSD News Article 89062


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lucy.swin.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.delphi.com!news-feed.iguide.com!news.ziplink.net!rtfm.ziplink.net!mi
From: mi@rtfm.ziplink.net (Mikhail Teterin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: shells
Date: 14 Feb 1997 05:24:56 GMT
Organization: Aldan at Newton Upper Falls
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <5e0sv8$hnj$2@news.ziplink.net>
References: <5dum9s$e1o@newsgate.duke.edu> <5duocj$nj1@two.woodyware.com>
Reply-To: mi@ALDAN.ziplink.net..remove-after-`net'
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.232.255.52
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35403

Honorable John Woodstock
      wrote on 13 Feb (in article <5duocj$nj1@two.woodyware.com>):

>>Why in God's name are there no decent shells included in the 
>>standard FreeBSD distribution.  What idiot would use csh or sh.
>>Everybody knows it all bash and tcsh these days.  Of course 
>>getting the port is simple enough, but even that is very painful 
>>with no command history and no filename completion.  Ha, csh
>>what kind of shit is that.  Get with the program FreeBSD.

And sh has history -- either in vi-mode or in emacs mode:
	set -o vi
		or
	set -o emacs
Dunno about filename completion...

	-mi
-- 
	"Windows for dummies"