Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.mel.connect.com.au!news.access.net.au!news.netspace.net.au!news.mel.aone.net.au!grumpy.fl.net.au!news.webspan.net!newsfeeds.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!uknet!usenet1.news.uk.psi.net!uknet!uknet!yama.mcc.ac.uk!cs.man.ac.uk!usenet From: f e l l o w s d @ c s . m a n . a c . u k (Donal K. Fellows - feeling spaced out) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.bsd.misc Subject: Re: Linux vs BSD Date: 11 Feb 1997 11:04:16 GMT Organization: Dept of Computer Science, University of Manchester, U.K. Lines: 17 Message-ID: <5dpjng$ibk@m1.cs.man.ac.uk> References: <32DFFEAB.7704@usa.net> <slrn5fejrn.353.bet@onyx.interactive.net> <32F788CE.7DA1@indy <32F8A363.41C67EA6@freebsd.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: r8h.cs.man.ac.uk NNTP-Posting-User: 8028 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.os.linux.misc:158445 comp.os.linux.advocacy:83940 comp.os.linux.setup:97354 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2497 [ Massive cut-down - apologies for context lost ] In article <32F8A363.41C67EA6@freebsd.org>, John S. Dyson <dyson@freebsd.org> wrote: > Even 2.1.X is faster in very important ways than the latest greatest > Linux kernel. Enumerate to encourage the enlightenment of the Linux crowd, please. Saying things like that just off the top of your head without some supporting evidence/references is merely flame-baiting. Donal. -- Donal K. Fellows http://r8h.cs.man.ac.uk:8000/ (SAY NO TO COMMERCIAL SPAMS!) (work) fellowsd@cs.man.ac.uk Dept. Comp. Sci, Univ. Manchester, U.K. | donal@ugglan.demon.co.uk 6,Randall Place, Heaton, Bradford, U.K. (home) +-> ++44-161-275-6137 Send correspondence to my office ++44-1274-401017 <-+