Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!nntp.coast.net!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!insync!uunet!in1.uu.net!199.232.240.5!news.ziplink.net!rtfm.ziplink.net!mi From: mi@rtfm.ziplink.net (Mikhail Teterin) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: different JDKs on FreeBSD Date: 13 Feb 1997 17:42:27 GMT Organization: Aldan at Newton Upper Falls Lines: 13 Message-ID: <5dvjq3$jbg$1@news.ziplink.net> Reply-To: mi@ALDAN.ziplink.net..remove-after-`net' NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.232.255.52 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8 Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35591 Hi! I have just compared the classes.zip files (and their unzipped contents) which came in jdk102.11-26.tar.gz and those from JDK-1_0_2-solaris2-sparc.tar.Z . All the *.class files are different. Since they are in the famous bytecode, which is supposed to be same for all platforms and they have the same (?) release id, are not they sapposed to be identical? Which is better with kaffe, netscape? Thanks! -mi -- "Windows for dummies"