*BSD News Article 89359


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.telstra.net!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!news.panix.com!mrw
From: awnbreel@panix.com (Michael R Weholt)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Dual booting between FreeBSDand Win95
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 97 12:18:06 GMT
Organization: Rookery Prawl
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <5e1l73$fj4@news1.panix.com>
References: <3301699f.14161936@nntp.sirius.com> <5e0ksu$d23@uuneo.neosoft.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mrw.dialup.access.net
X-Newsreader: News Xpress 2.0
X-No-Archive: Yes
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35567

In article <5e0ksu$d23@uuneo.neosoft.com>, 
    conrads@neosoft.com wrote:

>FreeBSD will install, as an option, a simple, easy-to-use boot manager
>that allows you to choose to boot from any of your active partitions.
>
>I have FreeBSD and Windows 95 on separate drives, and it's trivially
>simple to switch back and forth between them using this.

        I'm planning to install FreeBSD this weekend on my Win95 
pentium (a home machine, no network).  I have two drives that I've 
partitioned the heck out of (I hate 'slackage').  I have a ~500meg 
partition available as the second partition on drive #1.  I have a 
~475meg partition available as the first partition on drive #2.  I 
have a ~125meg partition on each drive available for a swap space.

Q1:  Can I install FreeBSD on the second partition on Drive #1?  
Should I?  Or, should I put it on the first partition on Drive #2?  
Or, no difference?

Q2:  Somebody suggested that I might want to put the swap space on 
whatever drive FreeBSD *isn't* on.  The idea being to take advantage 
of the two separate drive mechanisms, less wear&tear moving across 
across the disk getting to and from the swap.  Does that make any 
sense?  (BTW, I have 40meg memory.)

Thanks.

Michael R Weholt
 http://www.panix.com/~mrw/