Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!lucy.swin.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.ececs.uc.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!howland.erols.net!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!news.itd.umich.edu!honey From: honey@citi.umich.edu (peter honeyman) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 10:52:21 EST Organization: Center for Information Technology Integration, Univ of Michigan Lines: 12 Message-ID: <1997Feb16.105221@screwem.citi.umich.edu> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <DERAADT.97Feb15210103@zeus.pacifier.com> <5e62ct$rdo@news.bayarea.net> <5e6db9$8cg@news.pacifier.com> <5e6k49$621@news.bayarea.net> Reply-To: honey@citi.umich.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: screwem.citi.umich.edu Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5446 Jason R. Thorpe writes: In any case, my point, quite simply, is that the facts are non-public. facts are a funny thing ... people who believe theo's vangogh claims would hold that the facts are indeed public, and that your refutation simply does not exist. so the proof may not be public, even though the facts are. you keep talking about the proof -- what about the facts? peter