*BSD News Article 89549


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why no addusr?
Date: 15 Feb 1997 13:04:55 -0500
Organization: Panix
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <5e4ts7$gji@panix2.panix.com>
References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <1997Feb14.090136@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e2sb7$62a@panix2.panix.com> <1997Feb15.102849@screwem.citi.umich.edu>
Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5464

In article <1997Feb15.102849@screwem.citi.umich.edu>,
peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
>Thor Lancelot Simon writes:
>  >the fact is, openbsd dominates netbsd, and theo's "bad" attitude has a 
>  >lot to do with that.
>  
>  I don't understand what you mean by "dominate" and in fact I suspect that
>  you're leaving it deliberately vague.
>
>i mean it in the mathematical sense, as in graph or lattice theory,
>which is about as far from "deliberately vague" as you can get.

Oh, now *that*'s common conversational usage.

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon	                                          tls@panix.COM

 Stumbling drunk in the railyard looking for God: http://www.panix.com/~tls/