Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!spool.mu.edu!usenet.eel.ufl.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc Subject: Re: Why no addusr? Date: 16 Feb 1997 19:05:46 -0500 Organization: Panix Lines: 24 Message-ID: <5e87cq$2ic@panix2.panix.com> References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net> <DERAADT.97Feb15210103@zeus.pacifier.com> <5e62ct$rdo@news.bayarea.net> <1997Feb16.103325@screwem.citi.umich.edu> Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5481 In article <1997Feb16.103325@screwem.citi.umich.edu>, peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu> wrote: >Jason R. Thorpe writes: > > In any case, it suffices to say that I have the facts, and you do not. > Therefore, I suggest you refrain from commenting, lest you discredit > yourself further. > >jason, do you really think that your stonewalling tactics and ad >hominem attacks lend you credibility? peter, you have trouble with the notion that some legal documents *can't* be made public? Is that like the "trouble" you had comprehending the difference between sending email to a mailing list and filing a bug report? >i think it's a disgrace. I think this perpetual-disingeniousness trick of yours is a disgrace. -- This space not left unintentionally unblank. tls@rek.tjls.com $OpenBSD: locore.s,v 1.5 1996/10/30: Blindly integrating source code, $OpenBSD: locore.s,v 1.7 1997/01/24: so you can lose for 8 weeks. "Sleep tight."