*BSD News Article 89628


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.mira.net.au!inquo!nntp.uio.no!newsfeeds.sol.net!newspump.sol.net!howland.erols.net!panix!news.panix.com!usenet
From: perry@jekyll.piermont.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc
Subject: Re: Why no addusr?
Date: 18 Feb 1997 16:04:25 -0500
Organization: Partnership for an America Free Drug
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <87k9o5u8py.fsf@jekyll.piermont.com>
References: <none-ya023480001912962244220001@news.infi.net>
	<1997Feb14.090136@screwem.citi.umich.edu>
	<5e312c$fc8@news.bayarea.net>
	<1997Feb15.102158@screwem.citi.umich.edu> <5e4t6b$o5p@cynic.portal.ca>
	<1997Feb18.133406@luckey.citi.umich.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: jekyll.piermont.com
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.32
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5480


rees@umich.edu (Jim Rees) writes:
>   I do understand that Jim Rees submitted a patch to wd.c to Charles
>   Hannum, rather than submitting it as a PR.
> 
> Actually, I sent it to Herb Peyerl and he sent it to Charles.  I never heard
> back what, if anything, was done with it.  I would be very surprised to
> learn that it was ever blindly integrated into any version of NetBSD without
> being examined by a disk expert.

It turned out that your patch, although it worked on certain machines,
caused some serious problems for other people (i.e. caused serious
disk lossage).

We finally have a patch integrated that does the same thing but "does
it right"; I believe Chris Demetriou wrote the thing...