*BSD News Article 89788


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!feed1.news.erols.com!super.zippo.com!zdc-e!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!howland.erols.net!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!uunet!not-for-mail
From: mail25193@pop.net    (Fred Trottelhauer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc,comp.sys.powerpc.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy,comp.sys.next.programmer,comp.sys.next.misc,comp.unix.machten,comp.unix.osf.misc,comp.os.mach,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy,comp.unix.bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Apple Mach IS NOT a microkernel!!!!!
Date: 19 Feb 1997 04:31:03 GMT
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <5edvm7$t2v@news0-alterdial.uu.net>
References: <jm041536-1702972018170001@mencjo.apple.com>
Reply-To: mail25193@pop.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: cust42.max13.new-york.ny.ms.uu.net
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 v1.2.5
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.sys.mac.advocacy:179338 comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc:18416 comp.sys.powerpc.advocacy:15219 comp.sys.next.advocacy:55229 comp.sys.next.programmer:27405 comp.sys.next.misc:42785 comp.unix.machten:3722 comp.unix.osf.misc:3820 comp.os.mach:6013 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:53925 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2569

In <jm041536-1702972018170001@mencjo.apple.com>, jm041536@fhda.edu
(Joaquin Menchaca) writes:
>                         Microsoft with licenses from DEC will implement a
>distributed cluster based Operating System with Windows NT 5.0.

This will need to be watched very carefully, since Microsoft up until now
has shown itself to be oriented, under the guise of a cheerily populist
"software for the people", only towards foisting stunted garbage onto the
public.  Mircosoft rakes in billions by virtue of its marketing skill while
real computing power is not allowed to reach the masses; Bill gets press as
such a lovely bright young man while the interests that would maintain a
mediocre status quo and a population which is not independent have their
needs met.  If this is another effort in that same vein, then it isn't worth
a damn.  The company reminds me of what a New York City resident said in my
hearing one day, "we're the greatest city in the world.  We have the greatest 
art, the most brilliant minds, the finest culture.  We buy it all."  That mode
does nothing to maintain a living discipline, a growing ecosystem (computing
ecosystem in this case) - it reduces it to a dead commodity sold by degenerate
undead profiteers to stupified consumers.  Mircosoft should stick to end-user
products for the low end of the market, and keep its nose out of areas of the 
industry that matter in more than the short term.

>              [...]Some may say this is analogous to the Borg in
>Star Trek.

Your references aren't really an asset to your case...

Fred

Just as an aside, imagine for a moment what things would be like if everyone
in the workplace (note ! - just the workplace) who now has a PC on their desk
running a DOS/MS derivative would instead have a PC on their desk running Unix
with a GUI, a minimal administrative interface, and the productivity tools 
equivalent to what they have under MS (which exist, please don't even start that
discussion.)
Imagine !
     Half _years_ between reboots
     No stalls as your OS decides it's time to do some multitasking
     Fast task switching from the user perspective instead of Sominex-qualified
         GUIs
     Real, fast networking without hiccups and hangs
     Grown-up quality distributed facilities for file sharing and security
     A computing base that doesn't need a "revolution" every few years just
         to keep pace with hardware growth and user needs, because instead it
         is a non-stunted and correct implementation of the cutting 
         edge of developments in the field.
Imagine, particularly if you're involved in the business end of things, the
BILLIONS of dollars in increased productivity which would be realized if this 
were the case now, nevermind if it had been the case for the last say eight
years.

Microsoft just doesn't cut it as the candidate to lead the way into the 
computing future.  Others are more than qualified.