*BSD News Article 89896


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.rmit.EDU.AU!news.unimelb.EDU.AU!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.wildstar.net!news.inetnebr.com!netserv.unmc.edu!news.mid.net!news.cjnetworks.com!usenet
From: tdsmith@topeka.cjnetworks.com
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: I need MORE than 120 ptys........please help
Date: 22 Feb 1997 04:56:20 GMT
Organization: Capital Journal Networks
Lines: 41
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5elu9k$mvk@topeka.cjnetworks.com>
References: <3309E9A0.938@sticky.usu.edu> <330D4865.3F54BC7E@FreeBSD.org> <5ekmgp$mp@skunkworks.specialty.ab.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: port71.cjnetworks.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: <QVT/News ver. 4.0>
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:35943

In article <5ekmgp$mp@skunkworks.specialty.ab.ca>, 
jbg@skunkworks.specialty.ab.ca (Jason George) writes:

>Jordan K. Hubbard (jkh@FreeBSD.org) wrote:
>: Hal Lynch wrote:
>: > I have a Compaq Deskpro 5100 with a 100mhz Pentium, 81920K bytes
>: > of memory and Free BSD 2.1.5 running a gateway application for our
>
>: How much memory?  81MB?  That's kind of an odd amount. :)  I'll assume
>: you typo'd in a 0 and what you actually meant was 8MB, in which case
>[snip]
>
>Jordan, you forgot the key word in Hal's post...   Compaq.   :-)
>
>As anyone who's ever put their head in a Compaq engine bay in the (usually)
>futile attempt to debug a hardware problem will agree, there is compatible
>and then there's Compaq-compatible.  <smirk>   I've seen Compaq
>systems with odd amounts of RAM :  40M, 72M, 80M.  Why those amounts?
>Usually because some purchasing manager thought it would be cool to have
>something "different".   Blech!

I'll second the "Compaq-compatible."  I admin three Prolinea 5100e (among 
other) machines at work.  (I did most emphatically *NOT* recommend this 
pig-slow trio of garbage.)  No secondary cache.  No problem, just order 
some standard COAST modules, or so I thought.  Hardware guy sends over 
three standard modules in interoffice, we down a box, plug in the cache, 
and the frigging thing fails POST!  (From the sound, I'm not even sure 
that it *starts* POST.)  We tried all three modules in all three boxes, 
and all fail POST.  We call the hardware guy, he calls Compaq, and we're 
told that we're basically screwed.  I don't know if Compaq has a module 
that works, or if it's so hideously expensive that it'd be cheaper to buy 
a Cray T3E, but we ended up with no L2 cache.  The motherboard has some 
weird proprietary memory architecture, too, that allows SIMMs to be 
installed singly--32-bit path to memory.  These things are slower than 
the 486/66 that I sit in front of, and I host Office 97 for our subnet!
('course that 486 is an HP NetServer 4/66LF with SCSI-2, albeit with only 
24MB of RAM.)  Only one PCI slot, too.

Absolute fucking garbage.

Troy Smith