Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!news.mtu.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!howland.erols.net!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.best.com!nntp1.ba.best.com!not-for-mail
From: dillon@flea.best.net (Matt Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: USR x2 modems???
Date: 13 Mar 1997 15:10:09 -0800
Organization: BEST Internet Communications, Inc.
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <5ga1gh$jvv@flea.best.net>
References: <5g9l1e$hs8@newsops.execpc.com> <5g9vuc$n30@newsops.execpc.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: flea.best.net
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:37020
:In article <5g9vuc$n30@newsops.execpc.com>,
:Scott Thomason <scotthom@execpc.com> wrote:
:>scotthom@execpc.com (Scott Thomason) wrote:
:>
:>>Is there any reason one of the new USR x2 modems would not work on a
:>>freebsd system, assuming the hardware is new enough that the UART
:>>isn't an issue?
:>
:>Does anyone care to speculate whether the x2 modems will work fine
:>under freeBSD ( as opposed to the relative merits or obscurity of the
:>x2 technology ;> )?
Oh, ok :-) I'll have a wack at it: I see no reason why not. People
are already running their serial ports at 115200 (or faster) and the
AT command set isn't changing or anything, so...
-Matt