*BSD News Article 91466


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!news.cs.su.oz.au!metro!metro!munnari.OZ.AU!uunet!in2.uu.net!206.229.87.25!news.sprintlink.net!news-peer.sprintlink.net!howland.erols.net!rill.news.pipex.net!pipex!tank.news.pipex.net!pipex!news.utell.co.uk!usenet
From: brian@shift.lan.awfulhak.org (Brian Somers)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: dump and compression
Date: 18 Mar 1997 14:49:34 GMT
Organization: Awfulhak Ltd.
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <5gma1u$icd@ui-gate.utell.co.uk>
References: <5glaem$io6$2@kayrad.ziplink.net>
Reply-To: brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk, brian@utell.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Host: shift.utell.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Newsreader: knews 0.9.8
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:37347

In article <5glaem$io6$2@kayrad.ziplink.net>,
	mi@rtfm.ziplink.net (Mikhail Teterin) writes:
> Am I right, and dump does not attempt to compress the data?

Yep.

> If so, why?

Because dump dumps, gzip compresses ?

>             I can fit more on the same tape with tar/gzip, than
> with dump (unless the drive has hardware compression in it)...

Yep.  But then, you're using two programs - one archiver and one
compressor.

> Thanks,
> 
> 	-mi

You probably want to either switch on hardware compression or
use gzip with dump :)  That's assuming that you have a problem
with being able to fit more on the same tape with tar/gzip :)

-- 
Brian <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> <brian@freebsd.org>
      <http://www.awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !