Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA5310 ; Wed, 23 Dec 92 08:00:38 EST
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: ref.tfs.com routing (JULIAN --- READ THIS)
Date: 21 Dec 92 07:17:45
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <CGD.92Dec21071745@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <BzM1qz.9MI@ibmpcug.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk's message of Mon, 21 Dec 1992 13:06:34 GMT
In article <BzM1qz.9MI@ibmpcug.co.uk> adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (Adrian Hall) writes:
>It seems that packets for ref.tfs.com from Pipex (and presumably, anyone
>on the AlterNet too) get continually bounced between the following two
>routers :- [ ... ]
is this a 'permanent' condition, or one that occurs only occasionally?
the reason that i ask is that i've noticed the UCB has occasionally
had trouble routing to ref (and TFS in general), and TFS is sitting
directly off UCB, i believe, on BARRNet...
BARRNet's had a bunch of routing problems lately...
cgd
--
Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
"Sometimes it is better to have twenty million instructions by
Friday than twenty million instructions per second." -- Wes Clark