Return to BSD News archive
Received: by minnie.vk1xwt.ampr.org with NNTP
id AA5333 ; Wed, 23 Dec 92 13:00:49 EST
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!sgiblab!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!unidui!du9ds3!veit
From: veit@du9ds3.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de (Holger Veit)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: ref.tfs.com routing (JULIAN --- READ THIS)
Date: 21 Dec 92 16:06:28 GMT
Organization: Uni-Duisburg FB9 Datenverarbeitung
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <veit.724953988@du9ds3>
References: <BzM1qz.9MI@ibmpcug.co.uk> <CGD.92Dec21071745@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: veit@du9ds3.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: du9ds3.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de
In <CGD.92Dec21071745@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU> cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou) writes:
>In article <BzM1qz.9MI@ibmpcug.co.uk> adrian@rachel.ibmpcug.co.uk (Adrian Hall) writes:
>>It seems that packets for ref.tfs.com from Pipex (and presumably, anyone
>>on the AlterNet too) get continually bounced between the following two
>>routers :- [ ... ]
>is this a 'permanent' condition, or one that occurs only occasionally?
>the reason that i ask is that i've noticed the UCB has occasionally
>had trouble routing to ref (and TFS in general), and TFS is sitting
>directly off UCB, i believe, on BARRNet...
>BARRNet's had a bunch of routing problems lately...
>cgd
>--
>Chris G. Demetriou cgd@cs.berkeley.edu
>"Sometimes it is better to have twenty million instructions by
> Friday than twenty million instructions per second." -- Wes Clark
Seems to happen entirely since weekend. BTW: agate.berkeley.edu is
reachable without problems via barrnet, see the enclosed traceroutes.
Looks as if the problem is between pppl.es.net and t3.nsf.net.
Holger
>From du9ds3.fb9dv.uni-duisburg.de (134.91.100.13), just now
12/21/92 17:10 GMT+1
[17]/user/veit>traceroute -w60 agate.berkeley.edu
traceroute to agate.berkeley.edu (128.32.136.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 du9dgw-route (1s Angeles, CA
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: pollux.usc.edu
Hi folks. Basic questions about shared libraries in 386bsd.
I'm looking to get a 486 system to run 386bsd on, and need
to judge how much disk space I need. Since I plan to run X
on the thing, shared libraries impact heavily on my disk space
considerations.
Apparently someone has implemented shared libs for 386bsd.
The questions are:
1) how easy/hard is it to get/install?
2) has anyone produced Xfree86 binaries compiled for
shared libs (or will this be made available soon?)
Failing this, how easy/hard is it to compile the sources
oneself, using shared libs?
3) How much disk space are we looking at for bsd, all extensions,
and X using shared libs?
Any help greatly appreciated.
Mike Harm
mharm@pollux.usc.edu
Univ of Southern California
---------------------------------------------------------------
"I agree that 'two times two makes four' is an excellent thing;
but if we are dispensing praise, then 'two times two makes five'
is sometimes a most charming little thing as well."
-Fyodor Dostoevsky, "Notes From Underground"
From duplain@rtf.bt.co.uk (Andy Duplain) 724989098
Path: sserve!manuel.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!mcsun!uknet!axion!rtf.bt.co.uk!duplain
From: duplain@rtf.bt.co.uk (Andy Duplain)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: [386BSD] WD8003E card doesn't work
Keywords: ethernet, 386BSD, WD8003E
Message-ID: <1992Dec10.085131.1527@rtf.bt.co.uk>
Date: 10 Dec 92 08:51:31 GMT
References: <1992Dec8.144009@cs.u