*BSD News Article 92243


Return to BSD News archive

Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.ecn.uoknor.edu!news.ysu.edu!news.radio.cz!newsbastard.radio.cz!news.radio.cz!CESspool!news.maxwell.syr.edu!supernews.com!news
From: wcooley@navi.net (W. Reilly Cooley)
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD (or something else?)
Date: 27 Mar 1997 23:48:16 -0800
Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
Lines: 71
Sender: wcooley@rheingold
Message-ID: <m2k9msihj3.fsf@navi.net>
References: <5hcbac$r22@news.gvsu.edu> <333cddd8.1017100@news.sprynet.com>
	<87g1xgud2v.fsf@efn.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pdx-p03.navi.net
To: 
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au alt.os.linux:19517 comp.os.linux.misc:166945 comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:37986

David Welton <davidw@efn.org> writes:

> 
> lcappite@sprynet.com (Goatboy) writes:
> 
> > 
> > >1. Allow remote command-shell logins.
> > >2. Completely interact with programs running remotely (this includes
> > >   windowing applications.)
> > 
> > But all these are too slow to be useful if ur on a 14.4 or 28.8.
> 
> On a 28.8? Nope, I've done remote X stuff with it once or twice.  Not
> fast, but quite usable.  Rlogin and telnet on the other hand, are
> quite fast.

I have run Netscape, Emacs, and Xterms over my 28.8 connection many
times, and while it isn't as fast as using it remotely, or using Emacs
or vi over rlogin, it is _much_ less frustrating than trying to use
anything on my WfW 3.11 machine at work, which *constantly* locks up
and require re-boot.

> 
> > >7. Stay up for REALLY long periods of time and not be any worse for it.
> > 
> > So can NT.
> 
> Ummm I'd put my money on Linux.

I've crashed NT just running MS Word.  Also, after installing NT from
a CD-ROM, I removed my CD drive and NT would not boot.  I got one of
those blue screens with lots of useless information.  After
re-attaching a CD-ROM, it booted immediately.  It was fortunate that I
had actually sold the first CD-ROM, which left my attention to
installing Linux, which I got right after only a couple of tries.

With NT I have had many, many, many faulty attempts at installation.
Three nights I spent trying to install, and _finally_ discovered I had
the monkey virus.  (This was pre-Linux, so I cannot say what it would
have done.) If you think there is anything worse than waiting for
those three floppies the NT repair/installation requires, only to get
something wrong and have to reboot, think again.


> > WinNT an 95 aren't at ms's mercy. And if u want to change the OS, you
> > can. What's there to stop you?
> 
> The fact that the source code is not available?  When is the last time
> you recompiled your windoze kernel?:-)

Oh, and what about documentation?

I must admit, however, that the only time I reboot my system is when I
have to run an application for which there is no equivalent for Linux.

Wil

-------------------------------------------------------------
W. Reilly Cooley
NakedApe Consulting & Authorized Navi.Net representative
	And Programmer Manque for OrCAD, Inc.
1509 NE 10th Ave., #104  Portland, OR 97232
503 287-2165
wcooley@navi.net
http://www.navi.net/~wcooley

As a service, I provide analysis for viruses and poor grammar to senders
of unsolicited commercial e-mail at a rate of US$250 per hour.  Delivery of
said correspondence constitutes a request for the aforementioned services
at said price.