Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!munnari.OZ.AU!news.Hawaii.Edu!news.caldera.com!enews.sgi.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!news.panix.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: *BSD Unification? Date: 3 Apr 1997 01:33:52 -0500 Organization: Panix Lines: 18 Message-ID: <5hvj0g$gvj@panix2.panix.com> References: <860029226.1885@dejanews.com> Reply-To: tls@rek.tjls.com NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com X-Newsposter: trn 4.0-test55 (26 Feb 97) Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:38329 comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc:5726 comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc:44 comp.unix.bsd.misc:2930 comp.unix.bsd.386bsd.misc:1210 In article <860029226.1885@dejanews.com>, <prw@cyberwar.com> wrote: > In light of Larry McVoy's recent comments, I think it might be >appropriate to discuss (and perhaps bring closure to this argument >once and for all) the idea that it'd be better if all of the BSD camps >worked in unison rather than on separate projects. This issue is >brought up time and time again, but it never seems to be given the >attention it warrants. > It's really not an appropriate subject to discuss in public, or even in a large group. AFAIK all of the parties involved think so; ergo you are not going to manage to incite any useful discussion of the subject. -- Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com Most things do not correlate with actual behavior. -George Conklin