Return to BSD News archive
Path: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au!newshost.carno.net.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msunews!news.mtu.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!newsxfer3.itd.umich.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!howland.erols.net!news.mathworks.com!uunet!in1.uu.net!199.104.80.6!mars.hyperk.com!NewsWatcher!user From: cmott@srv.net (Charles Mott) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: Power of FreeBSD Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 19:15:29 -0700 Organization: SRVNet Lines: 59 Message-ID: <cmott-2804971915440001@192.168.0.5> References: <3363DC2C.55F604BC@obluda.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> NNTP-Posting-Host: ras673.srv.net Xref: euryale.cc.adfa.oz.au comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:39944 In article <3363DC2C.55F604BC@obluda.kolej.mff.cuni.cz>, Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.kolej.mff.cuni.cz> wrote: > There is DES challenge attack organized at Stockholm, Sweden. > > In list of supplied power by platforms you can see FreeBSD > at the dishonourable 6th place. It is far-away after Win32 > and Linux. Althought I and my friends add 3% to whole FreeBSD > power, we can't take the rest of the world. > > So, if you have a free CPU cycle (client is low priority task) > and you want devote it to "The Glory of the FreeBSD" ;-) > join the project. See http://www.des.sollentuna.se . > > Oh well, I know, this is a little off-topic, so sorry. > > Dan > The newsgroup title does have .misc in it, so I don't think you are being that off-topic. From the website you mention: Platform Total Blocks ======== ============ 1 Win32 (Intel) 715016 2 Linux (Intel) 548637 3 Solaris 397760 4 OSF/1 (Alpha) 118189 5 IRIX (mips) 96461 6 FreeBSD (Intel) 45204 7 SunOS (Sparc) 21981 8 HPUX (PA-RISC) 13821 9 Linux (Alpha) 10391 Earlier this year, I looked at a certain class of usenet postings for which it was possible to determine the operating system. An Alta Vista query obtained a Linux/FreeBSD ratio fairly close to the 12:1 figure we observe above. Since Linux and FreeBSD users are fairly similar bunch (many of us have used both), their tendency to participate in such a project is about the same. (Counter-example: this is probably not true for a linux/wintel comparison.) It may be reasonable to guess that the FreeBSD user base is about 8% of the Linux base. I don't think that FreeBSD users should feel bad about this. I think it is a strength of the free software world that it can support as many variations of unix as it does. (I still have to give OpenBSD and NetBSD a try someday). Is an individual citizen of a small country really disadvantaged in comparison to one who lives in a large country? Charles Mott